Sentences Of Gender Agreement

質問&相談、その他はLINE@まで!

 スマートフォンの方はコチラをクリック
友だち追加

The verbs must agree with their subjects in numbers and numbers and sometimes in sex. Articles and adjectives must correspond, in the case, the number and gender, to the underlyings they change. In some cases, adjectives and participation as a predicate in Swedish, Norwegian and Danish do not seem to agree with their subjects. This phenomenon is called pancake phrases. Barber, H., and Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical agreement of genre and figures in Spanish: an ERP comparison. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137-153. doi: 10.1162/089892905288011 Multiple studies are essential to address the causes of the overgeneralization of male concordance: participants react more slowly when presented with two female images compared to other experimental conditions (mixed male and mixed studies)? As in Experience 1, the conditions were grouped into sentences, each set having four conditions with the same head generators. An example of an irritation rate is given in (10) 10.

For each condition set, we created 12 sets, 48 target rates in total. In Nynorsk, Norway, Swedish, Icelandic and Norway, current participants must agree on gender, number and certainty whether the participatory party is in an attribute or predictive position. With regard to the Icelandic and the fist table, the current participants should also agree in the grammatical case. This combination of agreements includes only the owners of me, ours, theirs, his, theirs and yours. They always precede a bite of No, but not the one with which they agree: Badecker, W. and Lewis, R. (2007). “A new theory and computational model of working memory in sentence production: agreement errors as failures of cue-based retrieval,” in Talk Given at 20th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. San Diego, CA: University of California. Available online at: crl.ucsd.edu/cuny2007/program/235_Abstract.pdf We analysed the accuracy of the questions and answers and the reading times of the participants.

The data of three participants were rejected because they had <75% accuracy on comprehension issues. As a result, we had 36 participants, six for each experimental list. None of them made more than two errors in answering the target rate questions (a maximum of 12.5%). Unspecified pronouns (everyone, everyone, etc.) and many names (members, students, interpreters, children, people, etc.) are gender specific: they can relate to both men and women. To explain how brand effects can occur, resign several factors that have been proven to play a role in consultation. More stable head substitutions are more likely to be called than less stable. Structural attractors, which look like subjects, are more likely to be recovered without these properties than attractors. This applies to both production and understanding.

And regardless of these factors, marked features are more likely to be called.

シェアする

  • このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加

フォローする

 スマートフォンの方はコチラをクリック 友だち追加